Rust and Go are two huge successes in the realm of modern programming language development. The two languages compete in terms of backend web development… and it’s a fierce competition. For example, the popular communication app Discord just started swapping out Go services for Rust to boost performance.
Both languages are new, have growing communities, and are fast and efficient. When it comes to microservice architectures, frameworks, and apps, Rust and Go are household names.
Rich Standard Libraries
Rust and Go share many traits, especially when it comes to web development. They both have rich standard libraries, though Go tends to have more internet-focused protocols such as HTTP supported of out the box.
Both languages are open-source, meaning no company will be yanking the source code out from under us anytime soon, though it is worth noting that Google drives the development of Go, while Rust is more of a community project. There are pros and cons of company support. Go benefits from the resources and PR of a major tech company, while Rust will never have the risk of Google-specific agendas being pushed on the project.
Relatively New Languages
Rust v1 released: May 15, 2015
Go v1 released: March 28, 2012
Performance metrics generally put Rust squarely ahead of Go, but not by a lot. The Rust compiler and language design allow developers to easily take advantage of optimizations that achieve speeds comparable to the likes of C. On the other hand, Go trades a small amount of speed for simplicity and elegant syntax.
Both languages claim the title of “memory-safe” but take different approaches to achieve it. Rust catches memory errors at compile-time while Go uses a garbage collector at runtime.
Rust makes use of compile-time ownership strategy through zero-cost abstractions. If a Rust program is not memory safe, it will fail to compile. To anyone who frequently deals with memory errors in C languages, this is recognized as an amazing feature. Instead of clever compiler optimizations, the Go compiler adds a small runtime to the completed executable that manages the allocation and release of memory.
While both approaches have their pros and cons, generally speaking Rust’s compiler optimizations result in more performant programs. Alternatively, Go’s application code is cleaner because memory management is fully handled by the runtime.
It’s also worth noting that Go and Rust are both growing in popularity. If you want to read more on that, take a look at our article, “Rust vs Go – Which is More Popular?”
Concurrency is a necessity in backend applications. Some languages run in single-threaded environments which means they use some clever tricks to simulate concurrency without achieving true parallelism. Both Rust and Go have elegant solutions to build fully parallel applications, but Go takes the cake again in terms of simplicity, with the
go keyword being the only syntax necessary to spin up a new thread:
As usual, there is no outright winner, the results are more nuanced than that.
Rust wins at:
- Memory usage
- Fine-tuning and control over the final executable
Go wins at:
- Simple syntax
- Developer speed
- Concurrency mechanisms